Tackling Space and Time in Who's On First This is a blog post by stepps00 that was published on Jun 29, 2017 and tagged whosonfirst, data and yugoslavia
Let’s start with Yugoslavia
Creating historical records in the Who’s On First gazetteer for Yugoslavia is an excellent test case in helping us answer the following question:
How can Who’s On First catalogue and preserve records for Yugoslavia, the former Soviet republics, and everything in between?
The Library of Congress developed the Extended Date/Time Format (EDTF), and is in the process of adding it as an extension to ISO 8601. This date/time string is used to express the concept of a fixed or known date (
YYYY), as well as other semantic qualifiers like “approximately the year 2017” (
YYYY~) and “approximately 2003, but that is uncertain” (
This format is perfectly suited to tracking historical administrative records, specifically “places” in dispute and contention. Being able to catalogue a place with as many moving pieces as Yugoslavia allows us to use “soft” beginning and end dates.
Who’s On First uses this format for several properties, including:
Indicates the date when a place was first created or established.
Indicates when a place stopped being a “going concern”. The semantics for something ceasing may vary from placetype to placetype. For example, a venue may cease operations or a country may split in to multiple countries.
Indicates the date when a place was determined to be invalid (was never a “going concern”).
Indicates the date when a record was superseded by another record.
The Extended Date/Time Format is a useful method to categorize “soft dates” for Who’s On First, one example being the record for the country of Croatia as it relates to Yugoslavia. At the start of 1990, Croatia was a socialist republic within Yugoslavia. That same year, the government was dissolved in favor of a multi-party democracy and, soon after, an independence referendum was held. Independence from Yugoslavia was favored and within a month, Croatia declared independence.
This leaves us with a few questions. Do we use the date of the independence vote as the inception date for Yugoslavia? Do we use the date of declared independence as the inception date? Is Croatia actually a separate “place” from Yugoslavia? The answer to these questions is, well… yes, yes, and yes.
We can use both the date of the independence vote and the date of declared independence for Croatia’s inception date using the Extended Date/Time Format. We know Croatia succeeded Yugoslavia, but the debate lies at when this took place. Using the date/string below allows us to be flexible, but still catalogue the “place” of Croatia:
That flexibility let’s Who’s On First to note the times around both dates related to Croatia’s independence.
Let’s take a stroll through history
1918-12~ to 1945-11-29
In December 1918, the Kingdom of Yugoslavia came into existence after the dissolution of the Kingdom of Serbia and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Also known as the “Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes” or simply “Yugoslavia”, the country was a combination of six republics: Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia (including Kosovo), and Slovenia.
1945-11-29 to 1991-06~
Following an invasion and control by Axis powers between April 6, 1941 (1941-04-06) and November 29, 1945 (1945-11-29), the Kingdom of Yugoslavia was renamed the Federal People’s Republic of Yugoslavia, then renamed the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
1991-06~ to 1991-09~
1991-09~ to 1992-03~
1992-03~ to 2006
The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia dissolved in 2006 and, soon after, Montenegro joined Slovenia, Croatia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina in being internationally recognized as independent nations. Kosovo followed suit in 2008, with Serbia remaining as the successor state to Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
superseded_by entries in WOF records. These are pointers to other WOF records: a current record can supersede the record of a place that is no longer a going concern, and a record not longer a going concern can be superseded by a current record. Looking at Yugoslavia, this is effectively a linked list:
1108955789 superseded by 1126113567 1126113567 superseded by 1108955787, 85633779, 85633229 1108955787 superseded by 1108955785, 85632373 1108955785 superseded by 1108955783, 85632609 1108955783 superseded by 85633755, 85632667, 85633259*
* Note: Kosovo was in a disputed state between 2006~ and 2008~
Here is the dissolution of Yugoslavia in the form of a GIF, along with the WOF IDs and EDTF data:
You too can travel through time, space and politics by superseding layers in Tangram Play.
How does this relate to other records?
We’ve recently imported constituency data for the 115th U.S. Congress (take a look!) and have the scaffolding in place to import additional constituency data from previous sessions of Congress, as well as constituency data for other countries. While each Congress has a “hard” end date, the
edtf:* properties will still be used signify dates in historical constituency records.
Manifest Destiny project
The Manifest Destiny project is another interesting use case for the
edtf:* properties. This project has geometries of unclaimed areas, claims, states, and territories in the United States from March 1789 to the present; this is a proposed import for Who’s On First and an interesting test case for more superseding and date classification work.
If it isn’t obvious by now, tackling these types of issues can be challenging. We’re doing our best to catalogue historical places, but that comes with caveats. Using dates and superseding properties is helpful in creating a timeline of a “place”, but it is difficult to manage every edge case with the Extended Date/Time Format and other Who’s On First properties. Yugoslavia was an area with relative agreement when creating records and adding dates, but other places in long-term conflict will not be as easy to catalogue.
We welcome anyone to suggest improvements or methods to help us navigate through this historical work. If you have suggestions, questions, ideas, or comments, please let use know!
Photo Credit: Iraia Martínez, Pixabay. (CC BY 2.0)